Messages in this thread | | | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: notify_page_fault_chain | Date | Mon, 7 Aug 2006 16:55:36 +0200 |
| |
On Monday 07 August 2006 16:50, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> I consider it already questionable to split out a specific > >> fault from the general die notification (previous users of the functionality all of the sudden won't get > notifications > >> for one of the most crucial faults anymore), but entirely hiding the functionality (unavailable without > CONFIG_KPROBES, > >> and even with it not getting exported) is really odd. > > > >You want to use it for your debugger? > > Yes, in its "light" form (i.e. without exception handling framework changes) it has to rely on this infrastructure.
Ok. I can make it unconditional and export it.
-Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |