Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 4 Aug 2006 00:24:23 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller |
| |
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:40:09 +0530 Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> > So my take was "looks good, done deal - let's go get some sane controllers > > working". And now this! > > My recollection from the BoF is that people felt interface wasn't a major > issue and it wasn't discussed much. Most of the discussion centered > around grouping of tasks and the mem/cpu controllers and some additional > resource control requirements from openvz folks.
OK. That's certainly the area to be concentrating on.
> One way to go forward with the interface could be to request Chandra > to repost the ckrm infrastructure and see if the stake holders (primarily > container folks) can review and agree on it.
Fine. But let's separate that activity from the primary one: worrying about the controllers. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |