Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:43:47 -0700 (PDT) | From | David Lang <> | Subject | Re: A proposal - binary |
| |
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:
> The problem with VMI is that while it allows hypervisor side evolution > it doesn't really allow Linux side evolution with its fixed spec. > > But having it a bit isolated is probably ok.
actually, wouldn't something like this allow for a one-way evolution (the spec can be changed, but the hypervisor side needs to support clients what only talk older versions. i.e. the new spec is a superset of the old one (barring major security-type problems that require exeptions to the rules))?
David Lang - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |