Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 04 Aug 2006 18:57:01 +0400 | From | Kirill Korotaev <> | Subject | Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller |
| |
>>The downside to such a strategy is that there is a risk that nobody ever >>gets around to implementing useful controllers, so it ends up dead code. >>I'd judge that the interest in resource management is such that the risk of >>this happening is low. > > > I think the risk is that OpenVZ has all the controls and resource > managers we need, while CKRM is still more research-ish. I find the > OpenVZ code much clearer, cleaner and complete at the moment, although > also much more conservative in its approach to solving problems.
Alan, I will be happy to hear what you mean by conservative :) Maybe we can make it more revolutinary then.
Kirill
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |