Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] introduce kernel_execve function to replace __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__ | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Date | Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:20:28 +0200 |
| |
On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 22:11 +0200, Björn Steinbrink wrote: > On 2006.08.20 21:50:46 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > \ > > > Could we rename __syscall_return to IS_SYS_ERR (or whatever) and force > > > kernel syscall users to do the check? That way we could eliminate errno > > > > s/users/user/ .. there's one left that should die out soon ;) > > > > Only one in unistd.h, but throughout the kernel there are quite a few > unless I'm missing something here: > doener@atjola:~/src/kernel/linux-2.6$ grep \ _syscall * -R | \ > > grep -v define\\\|undef\\\|clobber | wc -l > 116 > > Are these just going to be replaced by calls to sys_whatever?
they're not the users of this, they're the definitions... ;)
-- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |