Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 19 Aug 2006 00:28:48 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: Network receive stall avoidance (was [PATCH 2/9] deadlock prevention core) |
| |
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:14:09 -0700 Daniel Phillips <phillips@google.com> wrote:
> So rather than just the word deadlock, let us add "or atomic 0 order > alloc failure during TCP receive" to the challenge. Fair?
If it's significantly performance-affecting in any way which is at all likely to affect anyone, sure.
You can get those warnings now with regular networking using e1000, due to a combination of excessive default rx ringsize and incorrect VM tuning. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |