Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 4/7] UBC: syscalls (user interface) | From | Chandra Seetharaman <> | Date | Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:27:34 -0700 |
| |
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 11:17 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 09:42 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 07:45:48 -0700 > > Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 12:08 +0400, Andrey Savochkin wrote: > > > > > > > > A) Have separate memory management for each container, > > > > with separate buddy allocator, lru lists, page replacement mechanism. > > > > That implies a considerable overhead, and the main challenge there > > > > is sharing of pages between these separate memory managers. > > > > > > Hold on here for just a sec... > > > > > > It is quite possible to do memory management aimed at one container > > > while that container's memory still participates in the main VM. > > > > > > There is overhead here, as the LRU scanning mechanisms get less > > > efficient, but I'd rather pay a penalty at LRU scanning time than divide > > > up the VM, or coarsely start failing allocations. > > > > > > > I have this mad idea that you can divide a 128GB machine up into 256 fake > > NUMA nodes, then you use each "node" as a 512MB unit of memory allocation. > > So that 4.5GB job would be placed within an exclusive cpuset which has nine > > "mems" (what are these called?) and voila: the job has a hard 4.5GB limit, > > no kernel changes needed. > > In this model memory and container are tightly coupled, hence memory > might be unused/wasted in one container/resource group", while a > different group is hitting its limit too often. > > In order to minimize this effect, resource controllers should be > providing both minimum and maximum amount of resources available for a > resource group.
Forgot to mention... There is a set of patches submitted by KUROSAWA Takahiro that implements this by creating pseudo zones (It has the same limitation though). http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ckrm- tech&m=113867467006531&w=2
> > > > > Unfortunately this is not testable because numa=fake=256 doesn't come even > > vaguely close to working. Am trying to get that fixed. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > > _______________________________________________ > > ckrm-tech mailing list > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech --
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose.... - sekharan@us.ibm.com | .......you may get it. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |