Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core) | From | Rohit Seth <> | Date | Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:36:38 -0700 |
| |
On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 10:23 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 10:16 -0700, Rohit Seth wrote: > > > That said, it sure is simpler to implement, so I'm all for it! > > > > hmm, not sure why it is simpler. > > When you ask the question, "which container owns this page?", you don't > have to look far,
as in page->mapping->container for user land?
> nor is it ambiguous in any way. It is very strict, > and very straightforward.
What additional ambiguity you have when inode or task structures have the required information.
-rohit
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |