Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core) | From | Rohit Seth <> | Date | Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:42:42 -0700 |
| |
On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 01:24 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > Ar Mer, 2006-08-16 am 12:59 -0700, ysgrifennodd Dave Hansen: > > relationship between processes and mm's. We could also potentially have > > two different threads of a process in two different accounting contexts. > > But, that might be as simple to fix as disallowing things that share mms > > from being in different accounting contexts, unless you unshare the mm. > > At the point I have twenty containers containing 20 copies of glibc to > meet your suggestion it would be *far* cheaper to put it in the page > struct.
I think the best would be to have a container for /usr/lib or /lib in this case where you can account all pages belonging to files present in these directories and shared across multiple applications.
-rohit
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |