lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 2/7] UBC: core (structures, API)
From
Date
On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 15:45 +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> We need more complex decrement/locking scheme than krefs
> provide. e.g. in __put_beancounter() we need
> atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave() semantics for performance optimizations.

Is it possible to put the locking in the destructor? It seems like that
should give similar behavior.

-- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-17 16:35    [W:0.567 / U:0.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site