Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 01 Aug 2006 17:47:17 -0400 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] include/linux: Defining bool, false and true |
| |
H. Peter Anvin wrote: > That wasn't the point. The point was that bool should be a typedef to > _Bool instead of an enum.
Quoting from the patch to which you are replying:
+typedef _Bool bool;
'enum' is only used for defining 'true' and 'false'.
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |