Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 01 Aug 2006 11:57:10 -0500 | From | David Masover <> | Subject | Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion |
| |
Horst H. von Brand wrote: > Bernd Schubert <bernd-schubert@gmx.de> wrote:
>> While filesystem speed is nice, it also would be great if reiser4.x would be >> very robust against any kind of hardware failures. > > Can't have both.
Why not? I mean, other than TANSTAAFL, is there a technical reason for them being mutually exclusive? I suspect it's more "we haven't found a way yet..." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |