lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> Bernd Schubert <bernd-schubert@gmx.de> wrote:

>> While filesystem speed is nice, it also would be great if reiser4.x would be
>> very robust against any kind of hardware failures.
>
> Can't have both.

Why not? I mean, other than TANSTAAFL, is there a technical reason for
them being mutually exclusive? I suspect it's more "we haven't found a
way yet..."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-01 18:59    [W:0.298 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site