Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability] | From | Bojan Smojver <> | Date | Sat, 08 Jul 2006 21:42:03 +1000 |
| |
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 21:31 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> It's only too slow on swsusp. With Suspend2, I regularly suspend 1GB images on > both my desktop and laptop machines. I agree that it might be slower on a > 4200RPM laptop drive, but you also have to balance this against faulting the > pages back in post resume (which will be slower because they're not > compressed and contiguous then, though maybe not not as noticable if you're > saving 75% of memory).
I'm one of those unlucky people with a 4200 RPM notebook drive, coupled with a crappy P4 based Celeron CPU. By far, Suspend2 provides a better user experience than swsusp, even when saving all of 700+ MB or RAM.
-- Bojan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |