Messages in this thread | | | From | Nigel Cunningham <> | Subject | Re: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability] | Date | Sat, 8 Jul 2006 21:21:01 +1000 |
| |
Hi.
On Saturday 08 July 2006 21:12, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > >Now... switching to uswsusp kernel parts will make it slightly harder > > >to install in the short term (messing with initrd). OTOH there's at > > >least _chance_ to get to the point where suspend "just works" in > > >Linux, in the long term... > > > > Long term being the key words. When will uswsusp be concidered 'rock > > solid'? 2008+? Suspend2 is rock solid _today_. Imagine a world where > > uswsusp is probably going to be used for SUSE10.2, so it will have to > be solid at that point. And SUSE10.2 is going to be > end-of-2006/early-2007, IIRC. > > > Linux drivers were as reliable as swsusp (granted I tried to get > > uswsusp working and I gave up before messing with the initrd stuff). > > Can I get proper bug report? > > > In order for uswsusp to make Suspend2 obsolete, it would have to *at > > least* support what Suspend2 does. Unfortunately, that isn't the case > > right now. > > Suspend2 does not have all the features uswsusp has, and uswsusp does > not have all the features suspend2 has.
Oh. You mean the rsa key thing?
Regards,
Nigel -- Nigel, Michelle and Alisdair Cunningham 5 Mitchell Street Cobden 3266 Victoria, Australia [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |