Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:50:31 +0000 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability |
| |
Hi!
> Pavel> I do not think suspend2 works on more machines than in-kernel > Pavel> swsusp. Problems are in drivers, and drivers are shared. > > Pavel> That means that if you have machine where suspend2 works and > Pavel> swsusp does not, please tell me. I do not think there are many > Pavel> of them. > > Accept the facts -- for some reason, there is a fairly large user base > that goes to all the bother of using suspend2, which requires ... > That is a fact, and all the hand waving won't change it.
Users like suspend2 eye candy => swsusp must be unreliable?
I know users that installed swsusp, decided they want progress bars, and went for suspend2.
> I'm tired of this. It's taking years for Linux to get reasonably working > suspend facilities, which is a shame. In my opinion a large part of the > problem is you opposing Nigel's patches. Problem is, for many people > Nigel's code works while yours does not.
Nigel only submitted his code once, month or so ago, as series of 200 or so patches. Do not blame me for _that_.
Pavel -- Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |