lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: __pa() versus virt_to_phys()
> Could anybody tell me the difference between these two symbols ?
>
> I know that one is a macro and the other one is an inline function,
> so the latter performs type checkings but I don't see anything else.
>
> thanks
>
> Francis
>

Here is the answer (by Dave Hansen, 2004):

__pa() is simply supposed to be the addr-PAGE_OFFSET calculation.
virt_to_phys() will be guaranteed to take care of any layout changes if
kernel addresses ever fail to be mapped flat, and 1:1 with the physical
address layout.

So, let's say that someone is working on ... say ... memory hotplug.
They will be modifying the virt_to_phys() function to make up for any
weird mappings that are going on. But, they'll leave __{v,p}a alone,
because those are used for stuff that occurs very early, even at compile
time.

More virt_to_phys() and less __pa() will save me lots of auditing later
on :) If you're not in early boot, or really know what you're doing,
use virt_to_phys() and cousins.

Plus, it's more type safe.



Lukas Jelinek
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-06 20:03    [W:0.931 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site