Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:25:07 -0700 | From | "Nate Diller" <> | Subject | Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion] |
| |
On 7/31/06, Horst H. von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl> wrote: > Adrian Ulrich <reiser4@blinkenlights.ch> wrote: > > > > Great to see that Sun ships a state-of-the-art Filesystem with > > > > Solaris... I think linux should do the same... > > > > > > This would be worthwhile, if only to be able to futz around in Solaris-made > > > filesystems. > > > s/I think linux should do the same/I think linux should include Reiser4/ > > ;-) > > So ZFS isn't "state-of-the-art"?
maybe reiser4 and ZFS are. certainly, they optimize for different behavior though
> [...] > > > But i'd rather like to see a Linux version of WAFL :-) > > WAFL is for high-turnover filesystems on RAID-5 (and assumes flash memory > staging areas). Not your run-of-the-mill desktop...
yeah, good thing nobody tries to use linux for high-turnover servers with RAID. pish-posh.
> > ZFS didn't really impress me: > > The Volume-Manager is nice but the Filesystem.. well: It beats UFS > > .. sometimes ;-) > > OK, ext3 + LVM it is then. > > > See also: http://spam.workaround.ch/dull/postmark.txt > > Interesting.
yeah, i hadn't seen postmark numbers on linux before. maybe mongo isn't so biased after all
NATE - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |