Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:54:29 -0700 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: [BUG] sched: big numa dynamic sched domain memory corruption |
| |
> Paul can you please test the mainline code and confirm?
Sure - which version of Linus and/or Andrew's tree is the minimum worth testing?
Could you explain why you don't think the mainline has this problem? I still see the critical code piece there:
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA if (cpus_weight(*cpu_map) > SD_NODES_PER_DOMAIN*cpus_weight(nodemask)) {
What other critical bugs are fixed between the SLES10 variant and the mainline?
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |