lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [BUG] sched: big numa dynamic sched domain memory corruption
> Paul can you please test the mainline code and confirm?

Sure - which version of Linus and/or Andrew's tree is the minimum
worth testing?

Could you explain why you don't think the mainline has this
problem? I still see the critical code piece there:

#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
if (cpus_weight(*cpu_map)
> SD_NODES_PER_DOMAIN*cpus_weight(nodemask)) {

What other critical bugs are fixed between the SLES10 variant
and the mainline?

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-31 18:57    [W:0.095 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site