Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 30 Jul 2006 02:00:59 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: Generic battery interface |
| |
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 03:42:25PM +0200, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 03:51:45PM +0300, Shem Multinymous wrote: > > Given the current usage pattern of sysfs, is it still a bad idea for > > it to carry device inodes? > > That remains an open question.
No, that's a closed question. It simply will not happen. Linus vetoed this years ago, for lots of different reasons that I can't recall at the moment (namespaces, permissions, groups, and other things from what I remember.)
Search the lkml archives if you are really curious...
thanks,
greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |