Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 31 Jul 2006 01:07:57 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: suspend2 merge history [was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion] |
| |
On Sun 2006-07-30 15:25:49, Hua Zhong wrote: > > I don't _blame_ drivers. I only wanted to say this: "If > > Nigel knows that some drivers need to be fixed and he has > > working fixes for these drivers, he should have submitted > > these fixes for merging instead of just keeping them in > > suspend2". Period. > > > > If I know of a fix for a driver, I always do my best to make > > sure the fix will get considered for merging at least. The > > problem is I'm not a driver expert and I can't provide the > > fixes myself. > > Suspend2 patch is open source. You can always take a look.
swsusp is open source. You can always take a look. And you can always submit a patch.
> Moreover, if someone claims suspend2 isn't ready for merge, or the
Moreover, if someone claims swsusp is broken, they should attach bugzilla id.
> I'm not exactly an expert, but I don't think suspend-to-ram is more > difficult than suspend-to-disk (probably quite the contrary), and > there are a lot in common.
As you said, you do not know what you are talking about.
Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |