lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
Le lundi 03 juillet 2006 à 20:46 +0200, maximilian attems a écrit :
> well but busybox is big nowadays and generally compiled against glibc.
> i'm quite eager to kick busybox out of default Debian initramfs-tools
> to have an klibc only default initramfs. those tools are needed atm,
> and there is not enough yet. afaik suse adds sed on klibc with a minimal
> patch and we'd liked to have stat, kill and readlink on klibc-utils.
>
> how about busybox on klibc?

I made a brief attempt to do busybox on klibc before klcc was working
right for me. I should try that again. In Ubuntu, we already do a
separate build pass of busybox to get just the features that we want, it
would be easy to play with this.

I'll let you know. It'll take me a couple days - between travelling and
the long weekend, I'm a bit behind.

Tks,
Jeff Bailey

--
* Canonical Ltd * Ubuntu Service and Support * +1 514 691 7221 *

Linux for Human Beings.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-04 03:40    [W:0.161 / U:1.992 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site