Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 03 Jul 2006 21:36:33 -0400 | From | Jeff Bailey <> | Subject | Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step? |
| |
Le lundi 03 juillet 2006 à 20:46 +0200, maximilian attems a écrit : > well but busybox is big nowadays and generally compiled against glibc. > i'm quite eager to kick busybox out of default Debian initramfs-tools > to have an klibc only default initramfs. those tools are needed atm, > and there is not enough yet. afaik suse adds sed on klibc with a minimal > patch and we'd liked to have stat, kill and readlink on klibc-utils. > > how about busybox on klibc?
I made a brief attempt to do busybox on klibc before klcc was working right for me. I should try that again. In Ubuntu, we already do a separate build pass of busybox to get just the features that we want, it would be easy to play with this.
I'll let you know. It'll take me a couple days - between travelling and the long weekend, I'm a bit behind.
Tks, Jeff Bailey
-- * Canonical Ltd * Ubuntu Service and Support * +1 514 691 7221 *
Linux for Human Beings. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |