lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: The ondemand CPUFreq code -- I hope the functionality stays
From
Date
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 10:54 +0200, Miles Lane wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It sounds, from comments in the discussion of CPU Hotplug locking
> problems, as though you are considering deleting the ondemand CPUFreq
> code.

Hi,

I think you misunderstood; we are considering removing the cpu hotplug
locking (from cpufreq), not ondemand itself. ondemand itself is not a
problem in itself, it's only the hotplug locking that's an issue (and
that issue is bigger than just ondemand btw)

Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven
--
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-27 12:15    [W:0.087 / U:0.508 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site