Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:34:41 +0200 | From | andrea@cpushare ... | Subject | Re: [patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n |
| |
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 03:44:38AM -0400, James Bruce wrote: > Andrea, > what happened to Andrew James Wade's rewording [1] of your config help? > It seemed to disappear from what was submitted to akpm.
Andrew picked the patch I made originally, before Andrew James Wade patched it.
Both patches are obsoleted by the new logic in the context switch that uses the bitflags to enter the slow path, see Chuck's patch. That will prevent the need of a config option because it's zero cost like the core of seccomp.
As long as seccomp won't be nuked from the kernel, Chuck's patch seems the way to go.
But the point is that I've no idea anymore what will happen to seccomp so perhaps all patches will be useless. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |