Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 12 Jul 2006 02:36:06 +0200 | From | Adrian Bunk <> | Subject | Re: [2.6 patch] remove mentionings of devfs in documentation |
| |
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 05:45:05PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > Adrian Bunk: > > Now that devfs is removed, there's no longer any need to document how to > > do this or that with devfs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> > > > > --- > [snip] > > --- linux-2.6.18-rc1-mm1-full/Documentation/ABI/obsolete/devfs 2006-07-09 11:22:37.000000000 +0200 > > +++ /dev/null 2006-04-23 00:42:46.000000000 +0200 > > @@ -1,13 +0,0 @@ > > -What: devfs > > -Date: July 2005 > > -Contact: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> > > -Description: > > - devfs has been unmaintained for a number of years, has unfixable > > - races, contains a naming policy within the kernel that is > > - against the LSB, and can be replaced by using udev. > > - The files fs/devfs/*, include/linux/devfs_fs*.h will be removed, > > - along with the the assorted devfs function calls throughout the > > - kernel tree. > > - > > -Users: > > - > > According to Documentation/ABI/README > " removed/ > This directory contains a list of the old interfaces that have > been removed from the kernel. > " > > we should add devfs to removed/
Thanks, agreed.
> Regards, > Michal >...
cu Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |