Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:28:08 -0700 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH -mm 0/7] execns syscall and user namespace |
| |
Cedric Le Goater wrote: > > How's that ? > > int execvef(int flags, const char *filename, char *const argv [], char > *const envp[]); > > initially, flags would be : > > #define EXECVEF_NEWNS 0x00000100 > #define EXECVEF_NEWIPC 0x00000200 > #define EXECVEF_NEWUTS 0x00000400 > #define EXECVEF_NEWUSER 0x00000800 > > execvef() would behave like execve() if flags == 0 and would return EINVAL > if flags is invalid. unshare of a namespace can fail and usually returns > ENOMEM. >
To be more specific, I guess, what I'm proposing is:
int execxveat(int flags, int dirfd, const char *filename, char * const *argv, char * const *envp);
... with the -x- for the flags field; that can be dropped since it's already established that -at() variants can take additional flags.
-hpa
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |