Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 7 May 2006 14:18:25 +0100 | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: sched_clock() uses are broken |
| |
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 11:00:29PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > Nick Piggin wrote: > > >I stand by my first reply to your comment WRT the API. > > Actually, on rereading, it seems like I was a bit confused about > your proposal. I don't think you specified anyway the units > returned by your new sched_clock(). So it is identical to my > "corrected" interface :\
Okay, so that presumably means we have to either stick with what we currently have, or go the whole hog and re-implement the sched_clock() support?
IOW, my patch on 2nd May isn't of any use as it currently stands?
-- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |