Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 31 May 2006 18:00:29 +0100 | From | Andy Whitcroft <> | Subject | Re: mem_map definition / declaration. |
| |
Ralf Baechle wrote: > mm/memory defines mem_map and max_mapnr only if !CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES. > <linux/mm.h> declares mem_map[] if !CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM. Shouldn't > both depend on !CONFIG_FLATMEM? As things are now mem_map may be > declared but not defined for a non-NUMA sparsemem system which may make > tracking a remaining mem_map reference in the code a little harder.
Sounds suspect for sure. I will take a look and see. Thanks for the head up.
-apw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |