lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.17-rc5-mm1
On 30/05/06, Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 30/05/06, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.17-rc5/2.6.17-rc5-mm1/
> >
>
> SCSI or libata problem.
> ============================
> [ BUG: illegal lock usage! ]
> ----------------------------
> illegal {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage.
> init/1 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
> (&base->lock#2){++..}, at: [<c0129a24>] lock_timer_base+0x29/0x55
> {in-hardirq-W} state was registered at:
> [<c0139a56>] lockdep_acquire+0x69/0x82
> [<c02f237c>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x2a/0x3a
> [<c0129a24>] lock_timer_base+0x29/0x55
> [<c0129e48>] del_timer+0x19/0x4c
> [<c02651e2>] scsi_delete_timer+0xe/0x1f
> [<c0262964>] scsi_done+0xb/0x19
> [<c0273ed3>] ata_scsi_qc_complete+0x73/0x7f
> [<c027024a>] __ata_qc_complete+0x26c/0x274
> [<c02704f0>] ata_qc_complete+0xd5/0xdc
> [<c0270c42>] ata_hsm_qc_complete+0x201/0x210
> [<c02713e7>] ata_hsm_move+0x796/0x7ac
> [<c027314e>] ata_interrupt+0x173/0x1b4
> [<c014c4f4>] handle_IRQ_event+0x20/0x50
> [<c014d76e>] handle_level_irq+0xa1/0xeb
> [<c010579c>] do_IRQ+0xa1/0xc9
> irq event stamp: 576924
> hardirqs last enabled at (576923): [<c02f26c7>]
> _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x36/0x69
> hardirqs last disabled at (576924): [<c02f2361>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0xf/0x3a
> softirqs last enabled at (576878): [<c0125873>] __do_softirq+0xea/0xf0
> softirqs last disabled at (576869): [<c0105689>] do_softirq+0x59/0xcb
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
> 1 locks held by init/1:
> #0: (&base->lock#2){++..}, at: [<c0129a24>] lock_timer_base+0x29/0x55
>
> stack backtrace:
> [<c0103e52>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x4b/0xf4
> [<c01044b3>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
> [<c010457b>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
> [<c0137d63>] print_usage_bug+0x1a1/0x1ab
> [<c0138458>] mark_lock+0x2d7/0x514
> [<c01386dc>] mark_held_locks+0x47/0x65
> [<c0139745>] trace_hardirqs_on+0x12b/0x16f
> [<c02f2b61>] restore_nocheck+0x8/0xb
>
> Here is config
> http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/mm/2.6.17-rc5-mm1/mm-config2
>
> Here is dmesg
> http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/mm/2.6.17-rc5-mm1/mm-dmesg2

I can't reproduce this bug with current
http://redhat.com/~mingo/lockdep-patches/latency-tracing-lockdep.patch
and updated
http://redhat.com/~mingo/lockdep-patches/lockdep-combo-2.6.17-rc5-mm1.patch
but these two bugs looks similar (both were previously reported). Both
appears while starting avahi daemon.

http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/mm/2.6.17-rc5-mm1/dmesg_1
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/mm/2.6.17-rc5-mm1/dmesg_2

http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/mm/2.6.17-rc5-mm1/latency_trace_1.bz2
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/mm/2.6.17-rc5-mm1/latency_trace_2.bz2

Here is config
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/mm/2.6.17-rc5-mm1/mm-config5

I haven't noticed these bugs with "maxcpus=1" boot param.

Regards,
Michal

--
Michal K. K. Piotrowski
LTG - Linux Testers Group
(http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/ltg/wiki/)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-31 15:54    [W:0.303 / U:0.620 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site