lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: IA32 syscall 311 not implemented on x86_64
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:19:08AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:

> > > You make a good point. In fact, given it's unthrottled, someone
> > > with too much time on their hands could easily fill up a /var
> > > just by calling unimplemented syscalls this way.
>
> I never bought this argument because there are tons of printks in the kernel
> that can be triggered by everybody.

Then they should also be either rate limited, or removed.

> > Actually it is kinda throttled, but only on process name.
> > This patch just removes that stuff completely.
> > (Also removes a bunch of trailing whitespace)
>
> FF tree already has a different solution.

Adding a sysctl ? That seems way overkill to me.
What practical purpose does that printk solve ?

Dave

--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-22 00:31    [W:0.155 / U:0.504 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site