Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 21 May 2006 18:28:31 -0400 | From | Dave Jones <> | Subject | Re: IA32 syscall 311 not implemented on x86_64 |
| |
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:19:08AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > You make a good point. In fact, given it's unthrottled, someone > > > with too much time on their hands could easily fill up a /var > > > just by calling unimplemented syscalls this way. > > I never bought this argument because there are tons of printks in the kernel > that can be triggered by everybody.
Then they should also be either rate limited, or removed.
> > Actually it is kinda throttled, but only on process name. > > This patch just removes that stuff completely. > > (Also removes a bunch of trailing whitespace) > > FF tree already has a different solution.
Adding a sysctl ? That seems way overkill to me. What practical purpose does that printk solve ?
Dave
-- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |