Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 15 May 2006 15:08:11 +0100 | Subject | [PATCH] x86 NUMA panic compile error | From | Andy Whitcroft <> |
| |
Is this check now needed given we have the zone alignment patches in this -mm also? I think we want to make it at least possible to boot such a kernel on a 'flat' machine.
-apw
=== 8< === x86 NUMA panic compile error
Seem we have a syntax error rising from the the new panic added to let people know NUMA didn't work on physically non-numa hardware.
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org> --- srat.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -upN reference/arch/i386/kernel/srat.c current/arch/i386/kernel/srat.c --- reference/arch/i386/kernel/srat.c +++ current/arch/i386/kernel/srat.c @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ int __init get_memcfg_from_srat(void) extern int use_cyclone; if (use_cyclone == 0) { /* Make sure user sees something */ - static const char s[] __initdata = "Not an IBM x440/NUMAQ. Don't use i386 CONFIG_NUMA anywhere else." + static const char s[] __initdata = "Not an IBM x440/NUMAQ. Don't use i386 CONFIG_NUMA anywhere else."; early_printk(s); panic(s); } - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |