Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 7 Apr 2006 13:29:56 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: RT task scheduling |
| |
* Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> wrote:
> > >>> You should consider for a moment to allow for the binding of a > > >>> thread to a CPU to determine the behavior of a SCHED_FIFO class task > > >>> instead of creating a new run category. [...] > > > > with the observation that 1) binding is already possible [so your > > suggestion is apparently knocking on open doors] 2) binding is a > > separate mechanism (not adequate for all workloads) and it is thus > > orthogonal to what i'm trying to achieve with the "RT overload" stuff. > > Really simple and straightforward observations i think.
> First thing's first, SCHED_FIFO_GLOBAL for what you want in the main > line is the same thing as SCHED_FIFO in -rt, right ?
yes.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |