This message generated a parse failure. Raw output follows here. Please use 'back' to navigate. From devnull@lkml.org Wed Jun 12 15:15:50 2024 Delivery-date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 14:05:18 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932417AbWDDMEp (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:04:45 -0400 Received: from spirit.analogic.com ([204.178.40.4]:51462 "EHLO spirit.analogic.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932397AbWDDMEo convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:04:44 -0400 Received: from chaos.analogic.com ([10.112.50.11]) by phoenix.analogic.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:04:43 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Received: from chaos.analogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chaos.analogic.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k34C4hxG032434; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:04:43 -0400 Received: (from linux-os@localhost) by chaos.analogic.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id k34C4hmb032433; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:04:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060404024244.28E9A5F76B@work.bitmover.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Apr 2006 12:04:43.0571 (UTC) FILETIME=[F58E6030:01C657DF] content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: blade servers? Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:04:43 -0400 Message-Id: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: blade servers? Thread-Index: AcZX3/WtOG/LWHElQayevr8UzVzRQQ== References: <20060404024244.28E9A5F76B@work.bitmover.com> From: "linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" To: "Larry McVoy" Cc: Reply-To: "linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Larry McVoy wrote: > I figured that people here would know. If you were looking for blade > servers and you were more interested in cost and heat generation than the > most performance, what would you buy? We're looking for 20 x86 cpus. > They have to beat ASUS terminators (nice little boxes, if you haven't > checked them out you should, about $100 + cpu + mem + disk and they are > quiet and run on ~100watt power supplies so they don't generate a lot > of heat). > > So far, the stuff at www.rackmount.com looks pretty good but they are > (like everyone else so far as I can tell) focussed on performance. > For all of the Unix like platforms, we'd be happy with 2Ghz Athlons (don't > need opterons) with 256MB. It's true that for the windows platforms we > like 2GB because we use 1GB as a ram disk to get reasonable performance > out of @#!! Windows. > > Thanks in advance, > > --lm Check out http://www.siliconmechanics.com/c292/blage-server.php. We evaluated one (so far). Prices are not too bad, plus you can get 5 different blades. The full chassis, with 14 blades, needs good ventilation -- lots of power -- lots of heat! Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.6.15.4 on an i686 machine (5589.42 BogoMips). Warning : 98.36% of all statistics are fiction, book release in April. _  **************************************************************** The information transmitted in this message is confidential and may be privileged. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Analogic Corporation immediately - by replying to this message or by sending an email to DeliveryErrors@analogic.com - and destroy all copies of this information, including any attachments, without reading or disclosing them. Thank you. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/