lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [(repost) git Patch 1/1] avoid IRQ0 ioapic pin collision
Oops, previous message got sent before I had typed anything!

Andi, I just wanted to be clear that my patch is not a VIA workaround,
it is a VIA workaround workaround. So please don't remove my patch
while leaving in the original VIA workaround. That will break our
platform, and possibly others.

I don't know if there's an easy way to have both the VIA workaround
(Natalie's original patch) and the VIA workaround workaround (my
patch) in a more unified construct.

I believe our platform would work fine with the removal of my patch
_and_ the VIA patch. But, as you say, what about VIA?

-kimball

On 4/26/06, Kimball Murray <kimball.murray@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Andi,
>
>
>
> On 4/26/06, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 April 2006 21:53, Brown, Len wrote:
> > > I'd rather see the original irq-renaming patch
> > > and its subsequent multiple via workaround patches
> > > reverted than to further complicate what is becoming
> > > a fragile mess.
> >
> > Sorry rechecking - i already got the patch now. You want me to drop it again?
> >
> > I guess we could drop it all, but VIA must still work afterwards.
> > How would we do that?
> >
> > -Andi
> >
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-26 16:03    [W:0.048 / U:0.520 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site