Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:00:41 +0300 | From | Avi Kivity <> | Subject | Re: C++ pushback |
| |
Martin Mares wrote: > >> That seems to be a case against writing functions. >> >> Why is a C function acceptable where a C++ constructor isn't? >> > > Because examining a single constructor is not enough -- you need to > check constructors of all objects contained within the object you > initialize. > > Calling a C function is simple and explicit -- a quick glance over > the code is enough to tell what gets called. > > No, you need to check all the functions it calls as well.
But I agree that C is more explicit than C++.
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |