lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: C++ pushback
Martin Mares wrote:
>
>> That seems to be a case against writing functions.
>>
>> Why is a C function acceptable where a C++ constructor isn't?
>>
>
> Because examining a single constructor is not enough -- you need to
> check constructors of all objects contained within the object you
> initialize.
>
> Calling a C function is simple and explicit -- a quick glance over
> the code is enough to tell what gets called.
>
>
No, you need to check all the functions it calls as well.

But I agree that C is more explicit than C++.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-25 11:03    [W:0.113 / U:0.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site