Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Subject | Re: [patch 11/13] s390: instruction processing damage handling. | Date | Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:14:38 +0200 |
| |
Am Tuesday 25 April 2006 01:58 schrieb Andrew Morton: > Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote: > > + tmp = get_clock(); > > s390 has a get_clock()? I guess you don't use i2c much. > > We shouldn't use such generic-looking identifiers for arch-specific things. > But I guess you can defer the great renaming to s390_get_clock() until > something actually breaks.
Many places could probably just use get_cycles() if they don't need sub-cycle resolution. Also such an update could be combined with a move to the new store-clock-fast instruction.
Arnd <>< - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |