Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:28:40 -0700 | From | "Siddha, Suresh B" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched: fix evaluation of skip_for_load in move_tasks() |
| |
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 01:08:00PM +1000, Peter Williams wrote: > Problem: > > In the patch > sched-avoid-unnecessarily-moving-highest-priority-task-move_tasks.patch > I got a the sense of a boolean expression wrong when assigning a value > to skip_for_load. The expression should have been negated before being > assigned. > > Additionally, busiest_best_prio_seen is being set when tasks are moved > instead of when they are skipped which will cause problems when the > current task does not have prio=busiest_best_prio. > > Solution: > > Negate the expression and apply de Marcos rule to simplify it and move > the setting of busiest_best_prio_seen. > > This patch is on top of > sched-avoid-unnecessarily-moving-highest-priority-task-move_tasks.patch > > Signed-off-by: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.com.au> > > -- > Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au > > "Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious." > -- Ambrose Bierce
> Index: MM-2.6.17-rc1-mm3/kernel/sched.c > =================================================================== > --- MM-2.6.17-rc1-mm3.orig/kernel/sched.c 2006-04-25 12:53:39.000000000 +1000 > +++ MM-2.6.17-rc1-mm3/kernel/sched.c 2006-04-25 12:56:14.000000000 +1000 > @@ -2059,7 +2059,10 @@ static int move_tasks(runqueue_t *this_r > busiest_best_prio = rq_best_prio(busiest); > /* > * Enable handling of the case where there is more than one task > - * with the best priority. > + * with the best priority. If the current running task is one > + * of those with prio==busiest_best_prio we know it won't be moved > + * and therefore it's safe to override the skip (based on load) of > + * any task we find with that prio. > */ > busiest_best_prio_seen = busiest_best_prio == busiest->curr->prio; > > @@ -2108,9 +2111,10 @@ skip_queue: > */ > skip_for_load = tmp->load_weight > rem_load_move; > if (skip_for_load && idx < this_best_prio) > - skip_for_load = busiest_best_prio_seen || idx != busiest_best_prio; > + skip_for_load = !busiest_best_prio_seen && idx == busiest_best_prio;
I think we need to change this to if (skip_for_load && idx < this_best_prio && idx == busiest_best_prio) skip_for_load = !busiest_best_prio_seen;
Otherwise we will reset skip_for_load to '0' even for the tasks whose prio is less than this_best_prio but not equal to busiest_best_prio.
> if (skip_for_load || > !can_migrate_task(tmp, busiest, this_cpu, sd, idle, &pinned)) { > + busiest_best_prio_seen |= idx == busiest_best_prio; > if (curr != head) > goto skip_queue; > idx++; > @@ -2133,8 +2137,6 @@ skip_queue: > if (pulled < max_nr_move && rem_load_move > 0) { > if (idx < this_best_prio) > this_best_prio = idx; > - if (idx == busiest_best_prio) > - busiest_best_prio_seen = 1; > if (curr != head) > goto skip_queue; > idx++; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |