lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 05/16] GFS2: File and inode operations
    On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 02:53:16PM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
    > > Actually, the 0x0080000 flag has been reserved by e2fsprogs for ext3
    > > extents for a while already. AFAICS, there are no other flags in the
    > > current e2fsprogs that aren't listed above.
    > >
    > So if I call that one IFLAG_EXTENT, then I presume that will be ok?
    > What about the 0x00040000 flag? That would seem to be a gap in the
    > sequence (ignoring GFS flags for now), so should I leave that reserved
    > for use by ext2/3 as well?

    note that at least reiserfs, jfs snd xfs seem to use additional flags aswell.
    It would be really helpful if we could get a linux/fflags.h that collects all
    of having them spread all over. Anyone volunteering to create it?

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-04-25 12:29    [W:3.974 / U:0.040 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site