lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)
    On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 03:30:26PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
    > >> >> Well then, have a look at http://alphagate.hopto.org/multiadm/
    > >> >
    > >> >hmm on first sight that seems to be basically an extension to the
    > >> >existing capability() code... rather than a 'real' LSM module. Am I
    > >> >missing something here?
    > >>
    > >> (So what's the definition for a "real" LSM module?)
    > >
    > >No idea, try submitting the patch :)
    > >
    > Because it's too big, you only get URLs:
    >
    > [01/02] http://alphagate.hopto.org/multiadm/mtadm_hooks-2.6.17-rc2.diff 137KB
    > [02/02] http://alphagate.hopto.org/multiadm/mtadm_module-2.6.17-rc2.diff 27KB
    >
    > Don't mention CodingStyle, I know. This is just a post to respond to the
    > topic on why noone submitted it earlier.
    > I already see it coming...

    I don't understand. Do you really want to get this module into the
    kernel? Or are you just posting it here for the link when people
    stumble across it in the archives?

    thanks,

    greg k-h
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-04-21 18:17    [W:4.131 / U:0.032 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site