lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 4/11] security: AppArmor - Core access controls
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Seth Arnold wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 07:05:08PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Are confined processes always restricted from starting
> > non-confined processes?
>
> It is specified in policy via an unconstrained execution flag: 'ux'. Any
> unconfined children can of course do whatever they wish.

And the default is for the children to inherit the security
policy from the parent process, like in SELinux ?

How do apparmor and selinux differ in how they contain bad
things?

--
All Rights Reversed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-20 01:25    [W:0.204 / U:0.460 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site