lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)
    Quoting Greg KH (greg@kroah.com):
    > On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 09:22:07PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
    > > In general: I am probably too strongly tied to my own CodingStyle to
    > > change it for Documentation/CodingStyle.
    >
    > There's a very good reason the kernel has a consistant coding style, so
    > if you don't want to adapt to it, do not expect to ever get your code
    > accepted, it's that simple.
    >
    > Sorry to hear that such a trivial thing is going to trip you up.

    Greg,

    I think what really tripped him up was the response to his attempt
    to get the new hooks introduced: tinyurl.com/opo8h

    Jan,

    I think that the last response, by Chrisw, in that thread, was not
    a snide comment, but a legitimate request for a justification for
    the hooks. If they are a crucial part of your module, then i assume
    they should be pretty easy for you to defend, right?

    I think it would be worth trying again.

    -serge
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-04-19 23:02    [W:4.044 / U:0.112 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site