lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
    From
    Date
    "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com> writes:

    > Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xmission.com):
    >> Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru> writes:
    >>
    >> > Serge,
    >> >
    >> > can we do nothing with sysctls at this moment, instead of commiting hacks?
    >>
    >> Except that we modify a static table changing the uts behaviour in
    >> proc_doutsstring isn't all that bad.
    >>
    >> I'm just about to start on something more comprehensive, in
    >> the sysctl case.
    >
    > So assuming that I take out the switch(), leaving that for a better
    > solution by Eric (or Dave, or whoever),
    >
    > Is it time to ask for the utsname namespace patch to be tried out
    > in -mm?

    Can we please suggest a syscall interface?

    Eric




    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-04-19 20:31    [W:4.333 / U:0.316 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site