Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack | From | (Eric W. Biederman) | Date | Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:27:01 -0600 |
| |
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com> writes:
> Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xmission.com): >> Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru> writes: >> >> > Serge, >> > >> > can we do nothing with sysctls at this moment, instead of commiting hacks? >> >> Except that we modify a static table changing the uts behaviour in >> proc_doutsstring isn't all that bad. >> >> I'm just about to start on something more comprehensive, in >> the sysctl case. > > So assuming that I take out the switch(), leaving that for a better > solution by Eric (or Dave, or whoever), > > Is it time to ask for the utsname namespace patch to be tried out > in -mm?
Can we please suggest a syscall interface?
Eric
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |