lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks
    Date

    On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 23:55:25 BST, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 03:15:29PM -0700, Gerrit Huizenga wrote:
    > > configure correctly that most of them disable it. In theory, LSM +
    > > something like AppArmour provides a much simpler security model for
    >
    > apparmor falls into the findamentally broken category above, so it's
    > totally uninteresting except as marketing candy for the big red company.

    Is there a pointer to why it is fundamentally broken? I haven't seen
    such comments before but it may be that I've been hanging out on the
    wrong lists or spending too much time inhaling air at 30,000 feet.

    gerrit
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-04-18 03:48    [W:2.229 / U:0.064 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site