Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let NET_CLS_ACT no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL | From | jamal <> | Date | Sat, 04 Mar 2006 13:52:21 -0500 |
| |
On Sat, 2006-04-03 at 17:56 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > This option should IMHO no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> > > > > --- > > > > This patch was already sent on: > > - 12 Feb 2006 > > Yesterday I managed to crash my machine playing around with tc actions > within minutes. I haven't looked into it yet, but it seems it still > needs more testing.
Simple: Fix the bug and submit a patch. If you cant find the cause post what you are doing.
What is the metric for going from experimental to non-experimental? I surely hope it doesnt come to some irrational reasoning like "Patrick found a bug"[1]. - It has been around since 2.6.7/8; - I use it extensively on about 10 machines since (I am pretty sure a lot more extensively than Patrick) - I know people who use it extensively - I am pretty sure there are people that i dont know who use it extensively
So on Adrian's patch and above reasoning:
ACKed-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@cyberus.ca>
cheers, jamal
[1]If you used half of that logic on netfilter it would still be experimental or rather should be demoted to experimental.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |