lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [interbench numbers] Re: interactive task starvation
Date
On Thursday 23 March 2006 22:07, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Nothing conclusive. Some of the difference may be because interbench
> has a dependency on the idle sleep path popping tasks in a prio 16
> instead of 18. Some of it may be because I'm not restricting IO, doing
> that makes a bit of difference. Some of it is definitely plain old
> jitter.

Thanks for those! Just a clarification please

> virgin

I assume 2.6.16-rc6-mm2 ?

> throttle patches with throttling disabled

With your full patchset but no throttling enabled?

> minus idle sleep

Full patchset -throttling-idlesleep ?

> minus don't restrict IO

Full patchset -throttling-idlesleep-restrictio ?

Can you please email the latest separate patches so we can see them in
isolation? I promise I won't ask for any more interbench numbers any time
soon :)

Thanks!

Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-24 01:23    [W:0.286 / U:1.828 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site