Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:02:08 +0000 | From | Al Viro <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/10] 64 bit resources core changes |
| |
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 09:56:59PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 12:52 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > > > hmmmm are there any platforms where unsigned long long is > 64 bits? > > > (and yes it would be nice if there was a u64 printf flag ;) > > > > Adding a new printf flag is technically _trivial_. > > > > The problem is getting gcc not to warn about it every time it sees it > > (while not losing the gcc format string checking entirely). Do newer gcc's > > allow some way of saying "this flag takes this type" for extended format > > definitions? > > afaics there is none... even if there was a "just don't warn about this > one" would be nice.. but I don't see that either.
-Wformat is what enables those, so we can turn them all off. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |