Messages in this thread | | | From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: [interbench numbers] Re: interactive task starvation | Date | Thu, 23 Mar 2006 07:27:50 +1100 |
| |
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 23:14, Mike Galbraith wrote: > Greetings, > > I was asked to do some interbench runs, with various throttle settings, > see below. I'll not attempt to interpret results, only present raw data > for others to examine. > > Tested throttling patches version is V24, because while I was compiling > 2.6.16-rc6-mm2 in preparation for comparison, I found I'd introduced an > SMP buglet in V23. Something good came from the added testing whether > the results are informative or not :)
Thanks!
I wonder why the results are affected even without any throttling settings but just patched in? Specifically I'm talking about deadlines met with video being sensitive to this. Were there any other config differences between the tests? Changing HZ would invalidate the results for example. Comments?
Cheers, Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |