Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:22:24 +0000 | From | Al Viro <> | Subject | Re: Merge strategy for klibc |
| |
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 11:54:01AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Okay, as of this point, I think klibc is in quite good shape; my > testing so far is showing that it can be used as a drop-in replacement > for the kernel root-mounting code. > > That being said, there is guaranteed to be breakage, for two reasons: > > a. There are several architectures which don't have klibc ports yet. > Since I don't have access to them, I can't really do them, either. > It's usually a matter of an afternoon or less to port klibc to a > new architecture, though, if you have a working development > environment for it.
Which ones? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |