lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Merge strategy for klibc
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 11:54:01AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Okay, as of this point, I think klibc is in quite good shape; my
> testing so far is showing that it can be used as a drop-in replacement
> for the kernel root-mounting code.
>
> That being said, there is guaranteed to be breakage, for two reasons:
>
> a. There are several architectures which don't have klibc ports yet.
> Since I don't have access to them, I can't really do them, either.
> It's usually a matter of an afternoon or less to port klibc to a
> new architecture, though, if you have a working development
> environment for it.

Which ones?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-20 21:24    [W:0.134 / U:1.224 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site