Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 2 Mar 2006 22:47:32 +0100 | From | Adrian Bunk <> | Subject | Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool |
| |
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 03:52:17PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Mon, 2006-02-27 17:18:06 -0500, James C. Georgas <jgeorgas@rogers.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-25-02 at 17:01 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > CONFIG_UNIX=m doesn't make much sense. > > > > I've been building it as a module forever. I often load kernels from > > floppy disk, and building CONFIG_UNIX as a module often makes the > > difference between the kernel fitting or not fitting on the disk. Could > > we please keep this functionality? > > Same for me. Maybe make the offer of CONFIG_UNIX=m dependant on the > small/embedded stuff?
This wouldn't solve the problem that CONFIG_UNIX=m forces us to export symbols that shouldn't be exported: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/18/44
> MfG, JBG
cu Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |