Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:06:34 +0100 (MET) | From | Jan Engelhardt <> | Subject | Re: RFC: add an ADVANCED_USER option |
| |
>> > config ADVANCED_USER >> > bool "ask questions that require a deeper knowledge of the kernel" >> >> > config EXPERIMENTAL >> > bool "Prompt for development and/or incomplete code/drivers" >> > depends on ADVANCED_USER >> >> Shouldn't this be the other way around, i.e. ADVANCED_USER depending >> on EXPERIMENTAL? > >No, if there's a dependency between the two, then in this direction.
ACK. Advanced code is not necessarily "incomplete code/drivers".
>> If you implement it as above, people will set ADVANCED_USER to "n" in >> oldconfig and then be surprised that all experimental drivers are >> gone. > >What about no dependency between ADVANCED_USER and EXPERIMENTAL? > Sounds good.
Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |