Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 8 Feb 2006 19:10:48 -0500 | From | Kurt Wall <> | Subject | Re: "Changelog-2.6.15": missing signoffs, descriptions |
| |
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 03:00:01PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap took 50 lines to write: > On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Linda Walsh wrote: > > > Luck, Tony wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 05:06:05PM -0800, Linda Walsh wrote: > > > > > >> Actually, ("talking" to myself?), parsing this file a bit more, > > >> I find many (~134) that are missing "Sign-offs". > > >> > > >> I take it that "Sign-off"s are also "optional" on commits > > >> and represent that the author specified under the "commit" > > >> tag did not need a "Sign-off"?
[...]
> Linda, did you have some other point that you are trying to get to, > or is that it? There are real efforts being made, although not > perfect. That happens when people are involved. > Anyway, it feels like you are just getting to the surface/edge > of your complaint.
The way I read this thread, I thought the complaint was that she's having difficulty writing one or more tools to process the changes automatically. Perhaps I'm not seeing past the surface.
Kurt -- On a paper submitted by a physicist colleague:
"This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." -- Wolfgang Pauli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |